Additional Model Families Results

Back to design

Completeness and Source Learning

All six entangled SFT jobs completed. Every non-Pythia source passed the 0.95 source-learning prerequisite:

Model / sourceEntangled jobFinal strategy match
SmolLM2-360M21635060.9937
OLMo 2 1B21663370.9915
Gemma 3 270M21663380.9968
Gemma 3 1B PT21670770.9973
Pythia-410M, one epoch21635050.6051
Pythia-410M, three epochs21639700.8376

At 2026-07-27 15:16 EDT, the full logical-job graph contained 42 jobs: 40 completed, 2 failed, 0 running, and 0 pending. The two failed logical jobs are the Pythia Token inverse arms.

ArmEntangled SFTFactorizations
Pythia-410M, one epochcompleted5 completed; Token inverse failed
SmolLM2-360Mcompleted6 completed
Pythia-410M, three epochscompleted5 completed; Token inverse failed
OLMo 2 1Bcompleted6 completed
Gemma 3 270Mcompleted6 completed
Gemma 3 1B PTcompleted6 completed

The six original Gemma jobs with evaluation batch size 128 exhausted H100 memory during scheduled validation in the frozen-reference token-level cross-entropy path. Their batch-size-16 retries 2171730–2171735 all completed with exit code 0.

Post-run inspection found that the final continuous-generation evaluator reset the same random seed for every evaluation chunk. Commit 5bb11913 assigned a deterministic distinct seed to each chunk, and the corrected retries were pinned to that commit. Nevertheless, the new Gemma runs still collapsed between scheduled validation and the large final-test generation pass: final-test parse success was 0.1178–0.2897 for Gemma 270M and 0.3054–0.3549 for Gemma 1B, with strategy-match rate at most 0.0024. The seed reuse was therefore not the root cause of the Gemma endpoint discontinuity, and those final-test fidelity values remain invalid for scientific comparison.

Completed Factorization Endpoints

SmolLM2-360M

FactorizationDistributional FidelityRouter Strategy DecodabilityStrategy Alignment
Standard CVAE0.99620.68930.3457
β-ELBO0.99690.57020.3525
Global normalization0.99260.82850.8818
Token weighting0.98010.78590.8398
Global + token0.99170.87340.8154
Token inverse0.99560.60180.3818

OLMo 2 1B

FactorizationDistributional FidelityRouter Strategy DecodabilityStrategy Alignment
Standard CVAE0.98010.76690.3340
β-ELBO0.99340.62160.3477
Global normalization0.98960.81380.8223
Token weighting0.98000.87060.8877
Global + token0.98590.93970.8535
Token inverse0.97150.67640.4043

Gemma validation and analogical evidence

The table below reports all twelve completed Gemma factorizations. Fidelity and decodability are taken from the last scheduled validation at training step 1563; Analogical Transfer is the final-checkpoint pair_set_overlap_rate. These are recoverable results, but validation fidelity is not a matched replacement for the paper's final-test fidelity.

ModelFactorizationLast validation fidelityLast validation decodabilityFinal Analogical Transfer
Gemma 3 270MStandard CVAE0.9850.85980.2295
Gemma 3 270Mβ-ELBO0.9890.76850.2236
Gemma 3 270MGlobal normalization0.9880.91330.4521
Gemma 3 270MToken weighting0.9630.91820.5107
Gemma 3 270MGlobal + token0.9800.96790.5264
Gemma 3 270MToken inverse0.8640.87800.2861
Gemma 3 1B PTStandard CVAE0.9890.87120.2148
Gemma 3 1B PTβ-ELBO0.9910.79670.2041
Gemma 3 1B PTGlobal normalization0.9870.90360.5625
Gemma 3 1B PTToken weighting0.8460.96110.4414
Gemma 3 1B PTGlobal + token0.9750.96410.5371
Gemma 3 1B PTToken inverse0.9770.85820.2383
Gemma validation fidelity, strategy decodability, and final analogical transfer

Bars are aggregate rates and open points are the six benchmark tasks. The first two columns use the last scheduled validation; the third uses the final analogical evaluation. The figure intentionally excludes invalid large-final-test fidelity.

Distributional Fidelity is final aggregate test strategy-match rate. Strategy Alignment follows the paper and is final Analogical Transfer (pair_set_overlap_rate). Router Strategy Decodability is the mean of the six task-level linear-probe accuracies, ignoring a missing task value in Gemma 270M Token inverse.

Completed Distributional Fidelity and Strategy Alignment endpoints across additional models

Bars show aggregate endpoints and open points show the six benchmark tasks. The SmolLM2 and OLMo panels are current. The Gemma panels preserve the earlier invalid final-test diagnostic and must not be read as model comparisons; use the dedicated Gemma validation figure above.

Completed Router Strategy Decodability endpoints across additional models

The Router Strategy Decodability figure has the same qualification for Gemma. Its current scheduled-validation values are reported in the dedicated figure and table above.

Historical Runtime Context

ModelEntangled SFTFactorization rangeFactorization medianParallel critical path
SmolLM2-360M2.56 h3.12–5.13 h4.08 h7.69 h
Qwen2.5-0.5B4.22 h2.22–2.45 h2.36 h6.67 h
Qwen2.5-1.5B5.72 h4.45–6.05 h5.16 h11.77 h

The critical path assumes downstream factorizations run concurrently. SmolLM2 uses the six exact selected roles and includes their final analogical evaluation; the Qwen rows summarize the eight-job historical paper-method grids, so the comparison is operational rather than perfectly matched.

Task-level endpoints and runtime records are preserved in path:experiments/synthetic_sequences/disentangled/analysis/collections/cross-family-small_20260724/data/. Pythia observations are separated in pythia because its source did not learn the benchmark adequately.

OLMo 2 1B SFT completed in 6:39:05; its six factorization jobs took 4:53:23–5:44:27. Gemma 3 270M SFT completed in 2:56:14; its six successful factorization jobs took 4:29:53–4:54:23. Gemma 3 1B PT SFT completed in 5:36:13; its six successful factorization jobs took 6:31:56–7:04:52.

The reusable endpoint tables are at path:experiments/synthetic_sequences/disentangled/analysis/collections/cross-family-small_20260724/data/additional_model_endpoints.csv and path:experiments/synthetic_sequences/disentangled/analysis/collections/cross-family-small_20260724/data/additional_model_task_endpoints.csv.

The Gemma validation-specific tables are at path:experiments/synthetic_sequences/disentangled/analysis/collections/cross-family-small_20260724/data/gemma_validation_endpoints.csv and path:experiments/synthetic_sequences/disentangled/analysis/collections/cross-family-small_20260724/data/gemma_validation_task_endpoints.csv.

Built with LogoFlowershow