Challenges of Learning a Latent Variable Factorization of Pre-trained Language Models

This note records a writing-level framing of why the project is not just a standard conditional VAE setup. It sits between the paper-writing notes and the methodology/theory notes.

Related notes:

Relation to latent variable generative modeling

Our approach is related to latent variable generative modeling approaches such as VAEs. In a VAE, we observe data xDx \sim D from some data distribution and learn a generator p(xz)p(x \mid z) that maps a latent variable zz to an instance. Conditional VAEs apply this to learning a conditional distribution p(yx)p(y \mid x) from a dataset of pairs (x,y)D(x, y) \sim \mathcal{D}.

Central difference

Rather than learning from a dataset that defines the target conditional law, we are factorizing and adapting a pre-trained model that already models p(yx)p(y \mid x). The problem is not just latent-variable modeling. It is transforming an already-capable model into a latent-factorized model whose latent variable corresponds to abstract strategies.

Core challenges

  1. Learning a latent variable generative model over discrete sequence space with an autoregressive model class.
  2. Working in the adaptation setting rather than the ordinary dataset-learning setting.

The second point is the more fundamental difference. Rather than learning from data with some dataset

D={(xi,yi)},\mathcal{D} = \{(x_i, y_i)\},

we start from a model that already captures the observable distribution p(yx)p(y \mid x) and ask for a useful latent factorization of that law.

Challenges introduced by this setting

  • The generative model already captures p(yx)p(y \mid x) and therefore does not need a latent variable in order to fit the observable law.
  • The distribution may already be a mixed and entangled superposition of multiple strategies, with the latent "modes" entangled in the hidden states.
  • Posterior collapse remains a major risk, especially because the decoder is strong enough to model much of the conditional law directly.
  • Adaptation data comes from the model rather than from an external dataset, which makes the setup overlap with distillation-like training even if "distillation" is not quite the right term.

Why this note matters

This framing explains why the project has to combine:

  • methodology for preventing trivial or collapsed latent usage,
  • theory for understanding non-identifiability and selection among many factorizations,
  • experiments that test whether recovered latent variables align with intended strategies rather than arbitrary predictive partitions.
Built with LogoFlowershow